These chips could realistically be touted as low-cost alternatives to Intel “Gemini Lake” SoCs, although Zhaoxin is making bold claims about its performance nearing that of AMD Ryzen processors. I know what I have seen back then. Also if I remember correctly, was slower than BX in some benchmarks. The BX was only one thing, and that is stable. It was at that point my opinion and perspective about VIA chipsets changed. They had performance problems with their memory controller that where fixed with the A versions in both cases.
|Date Added:||3 September 2013|
|File Size:||10.22 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
But if that’s the reason VIA has been allowed to continue, that puts VIA in a crappy position with regards to potentially putting out truly competitive products. Every game and testing suite used rendered scores that were equal to or very near identical scores. I managed to clock one of my 1. I do wonder if VIA will maintain their license in the future; Intel and AMD have a bunch of cross-licensing of x86 patents that keep them dependent on each other.
These are full-fledged SoCs, which completely integrate the chipset including the southrbidge. It was at that point my opinion and perspective about VIA chipsets changed.
ABIT VH6T, Socket , Intel Motherboard | eBay
In any case Apollo was much worst than BX. I know what I have seen back then. The only really good thing they had to show, was their Vinyl Audio. I just knew someone will say VIA is Cyrix Granted, VIA isn’t exactly a significant competitor.
ABIT VH6T, Socket 370, Intel Motherboard
The big problem with VIA chipsets, especially the first revisions, where the memory bandwidth. They had performance problems with their memory controller that where fixed with the A versions in both cases. There was also the CPU cache latency issue with thebut since it was designed to run socket chips with on die cache, it’s not really an issue. VIA was great as long controlleer there was no competition to show vy6t chipsets weaknesses in performance.
Anyway, prove your claims before calling my benchmarks wrong. Also if I remember correctly, was slower than BX in some benchmarks.
ABIT VH6T Drivers
It is by no means a fast chipset unless you compare it with socket 7 machines. Don’t get me wrong. All you have to back up your claims are words.
Post benchmarks to prove you claims. That’s why you always waited for the A versions. I was under the opinion, like yours, and a friend benchmarked VIA vs Intel abkt mobo’s right in front of me.
SiS was beating those first versions, with chipsets like the excellent in memory performance. So, don’t be so sure.
VIA and Zhaoxin have been co-developing the ZX family of x86 processors for rollout inand at least on paper, the chips appear to have the chops to take on Intel’s “Gemini Lake” SoCs. With a fast AGP 4x card, the performs horribly. Can you prove your findings, or those university degrees are considered proof of everything you post?
Collecting, repairing and messing around with old x86 aueio is what I’ve been doing for the past 6 years. It is in fact the slowest of all socket chipsets. Sorry, auddio I know what I have seen back then. We are completely unknown and degrees, experiences and system specs, convince no one.
Both of those statements do not jive with real world testing and benchmarks of the time. VIA has no such thing to hedge in on the duopoly. Also you have to realize that degrees and years of experience means nothing to the other person. You really don’t have to convince everyone. abir